I wonder how some people can say that their event or idea is well received when evidently it is not.
I just saw this email where one of the heads mentioned that one of the events is well received last year and so the school will be doing the same thing again this year. This email caused me to faint, literally.
In PW we always tell our students to substaintiate whatever is important to them. For instance, if they want to say that their proposed event will be well received, they either have to find some source which supports their view or do a pilot test to see if what they think is true. So I wonder if the head went out to do a simple perception survey. Or did I do any survey but the response was not regarded because of some reason to do with 'convenience'?
I sometimes wonder if our feedback is collected and chucked somewhere and things continue to be the same as long as somebody says the event is well received.
This makes me apathetic to future surveys and feedback collection processes.
I just saw this email where one of the heads mentioned that one of the events is well received last year and so the school will be doing the same thing again this year. This email caused me to faint, literally.
In PW we always tell our students to substaintiate whatever is important to them. For instance, if they want to say that their proposed event will be well received, they either have to find some source which supports their view or do a pilot test to see if what they think is true. So I wonder if the head went out to do a simple perception survey. Or did I do any survey but the response was not regarded because of some reason to do with 'convenience'?
I sometimes wonder if our feedback is collected and chucked somewhere and things continue to be the same as long as somebody says the event is well received.
This makes me apathetic to future surveys and feedback collection processes.
